coin project
Stable diffusion
Please support our sponsors


Log In | Register
[83796 Coins (44240 Unverified)]
 
 
Search
Advanced Search
Search By Coin ID
 
 
Home
ANCIENT/BYZANTINE
Ancient Spain (872)
Byzantine (753)
MEDIEVAL/EARLY WORLD
Germany (30)
MODERN WORLD
COUNTERFEITS AND IMITATIONS
 
Submit New Coin(s)
 
Sponsors page
Terms of Service
Contact Us
About Us
FAQ Page
Coin Detail
Click here to see enlarged image.
ID:     79001262
     [UNVERIFIED]
Type:     Roman Imperial
Issuer:     Julius Nepos
Date Ruled:     A.D. 474-5/480
Metal:     Gold
Denomination:     Tremissis
Struck / Cast:     struck
Date Struck:     AD 474-475/480
Weight:     1.48 g
Die Axis:     12 h
Obverse Legend:     D N IVL NEPOS P F AVG
Obverse Description:     Pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust right
Reverse Legend:     CONOB
Reverse Description:     Cross within wreath
Exergue:     CONOB
Mint Mark:     CONOB
Mint:     Mediolanum (Milan)
Primary Reference:     RIC X P. 206 cf.
Reference2:     Lacam pl. CLXXIII cf. (both referencing lot 301 of Hess-Leu 4 April 1963 sale)
Photograph Credit:     Classical Numismatic Group
Source:     http://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=127773
Grade:     Good VF, a few scrapes
Notes:     Sale: CNG 79, Lot: 1262 Extremely rare, the second known. From the Gordon S. Parry Collection. Ex Credit de la Bourse (19 April 1995), lot 682. The appearance of the mintmark CONOB, rather than COMOB, on a coin of Nepos is exceptional. Only the Hess-Leu coin has been published with this mark, which is referenced by both Lacam and Kent (in RIC). Lacam attributed the coin as a late official issue at Milan, but his analysis is based solely on style, and does not address the mintmark at all. Kent, on the other hand, clearly marks the coin as a contemporary imitation. While Kent may be correct to dismiss the coin as imitative, the style is clearly within the bounds for an attribution to the official mint. The military activity in northern Italy at the time presents numerous possibilities; perhaps it was struck at a military mint employing a die cutter who had worked at Milan? In any event, the current body of evidence is inconclusive.