coin project
Civitas Galleries
Please support our sponsors


Log In | Register
[83524 Coins (44231 Unverified)]
 
 
Search
Advanced Search
Search By Coin ID
 
 
Home
ANCIENT/BYZANTINE
Ancient Africa (157)
Ancient East (4671)
Ancient Spain (872)
Byzantine (753)
Celtic (372)
Goths, Vandals (259)
Greek (22306)
Roman Imperial (32425)
Roman Provincial (8276)
Roman Republican & Imperatorial (2318)
MEDIEVAL/EARLY WORLD
Ancient and Medieval India (71)
Ancient and Medieval Far East (10245)
Central Europe and Italy (20)
Eastern Europe and Scandinavia (54)
Germany (30)
Islamic (18)
Western Europe (102)
MODERN WORLD
Africa (5)
Asia (0)
Australia and the Pacific Islands (0)
Europe (17)
North America (0)
South America (0)
COUNTERFEITS AND IMITATIONS
Ancient Imitations (444)
Modern Forgeries of Ancient Coins (19)
Medieval Imitations (0)
Modern Forgeries of Medieval Coins (0)
Modern Forgeries of Modern Coins (0)
 
Submit New Coin(s)
 
Sponsors page
Terms of Service
Contact Us
About Us
FAQ Page
Coin Detail
Click here to see enlarged image.
ID:     841493
     [UNVERIFIED]
Type:     Greek
Region:     THESSALY
City:     Rhodian Mercenaries
Issuer:     Perseus
Date Ruled:     179-168 BC
Metal:     Silver
Denomination:     Drachm
Struck / Cast:     struck
Date Struck:     BC 171-170
Diameter:     15 mm
Weight:     2.51 g
Die Axis:     5 h
Obverse Description:     Head of Helios facing slightly right
Reverse Legend:     ΕΡΜΙΑΣ
Reverse Description:     Rose with bud to right
Mint:     Uncertain
Primary Reference:     Price, Larissa P. 241
Reference2:     SNG Keckman 795
Photograph Credit:     Classical Numismatic Group
Source:     http://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=139325
Grade:     EF, bright surfaces.
Notes:     In his 1988 article on Rhodian imitations, R. Ashton has argued persuasively that this coinage was struck by Perseus to pay Cretan mercenaries serving in his army (see “A Series of Pseudo-Rhodian Drachms from Mainland Greece,” NC 1988, pp. 29-30). Rhodian coinage circulated on Crete, where it was a familiar and trusted currency for the locals, and it is likely that they would have required payment in that form (see also Ashton, SM 146 (May 1987), p. 34).